Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review
dc.contributor.author | Costa, Moacir Guilherme da | |
dc.contributor.author | Pazzini, Camila Alessandra | |
dc.contributor.author | Pantuzo, Mariele Cristina Garcia | |
dc.contributor.author | Jorge, Maria Letícia Ramos [UFVJM] | |
dc.contributor.author | Marques, Leandro Silva [UFVJM] | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Vale do Rio Verde (UninCor) School of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) School of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-06T17:11:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-06T17:11:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-04-01 | |
dc.description.abstracts | The present systematic review was performed to investigate if there is evidence justifying the prophylactic extraction of third molars, one of the most frequent procedures in oral surgery. A series of searches was carried out for randomized, clinical trials and systematic reviews in seven databases (MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Web of Science, EMBASE, BIREME and Cochrane Library), with no restrictions regarding year or language. A supplemental manual search of the references of retrieved articles was also performed. The search strategy resulted in 260 papers. Both the data extracted and the quality of each paper were evaluated independently by two reviewers. After selection based on the preestablished eligibility criteria, four papers qualified for the final analysis. A medium degree of quality and methodological consistency was found in three studies, and low quality was found in one study. No studies showed a high degree of consistency. The most significant flaw was an inadequate sample size. The results of the present review indicate a lack of scientific evidence to justify the indication of the prophylactic extraction of third molars. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (EPAMIG) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242013000100024 | |
dc.identifier.citation | COSTA, Moacir Guilherme da et al. Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review. Brazilian Oral Research, São Paulo, v. 27, n. 2, p. 183-188, 2013. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1590/S1806-83242013000100024 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1806-8324 | |
dc.identifier.scielo | S1806-83242013000200183 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.ufvjm.edu.br/items/6562f362-3ad0-475a-805a-f4dd79cf98f5 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Brazilian Oral Research | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Acesso aberto | |
dc.source | SciELO | |
dc.subject.keyword | Tooth extraction | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Molar, third | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Pathology | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Crowding | en |
dc.title | Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review | en |
dc.type | Artigo | pt_BR |